
How Andy Penn remodeled Australian telecom Telstra
As CEO of the Australian telecommunications firm Telstra—from 2015 till he stepped down this 12 months, on September 1—Andy Penn noticed his justifiable share of challenges. They embrace navigating critical community outages that shook the corporate’s core worth proposition, constructing the fitting management staff for the corporate’s transformation, and staying the course within the face of impatient market expectations.
He not too long ago spoke with McKinsey senior companion Wesley Walden concerning the challenges of remodeling a company whereas sustaining an modern spirit and worker engagement. Penn and his staff reinvented Telstra throughout a number of dimensions over a seven-year interval, beginning with reshaping the fee base after which, in 2018, launching and delivering a daring transformation technique, dubbed T22. T22 restructured the corporate, separated out bodily infrastructure belongings, embedded agile methods of working, and simplified Telstra’s product choices.
Penn explains how offering readability in technique and communications, in addition to consistency in follow-through, was crucial to the corporate’s transformation. “When you enable ambiguity to filter into what you’re attempting to do, abruptly you lose management of the agenda,” he says. A part of that’s not letting selections sit too lengthy, as a result of, sadly, they don’t get higher with age. An edited model of the dialog follows.
Wes Walden: How would you describe the most important shifts which have taken place at Telstra because you grew to become CEO in 2015?
Andy Penn: The reinvention has been very a lot about having to seriously change the corporate from 150 years of historical past and of doing issues in a selected method to being arrange to achieve success in a world that’s going via one other radical change in relation to know-how.
We have been by no means going to try this in an incremental approach. It needed to be a whole turning on its head—and dynamic when it comes to how we take into consideration the enterprise, how we take into consideration engagement with the shopper, and the way we take into consideration the best way we work. Whereas I’ve been with the corporate for less than ten years, I may see throughout my time as CFO simply how onerous it was to vary issues. We had to consider how we may do that in such a approach that might mitigate the resistance to vary that might inevitably happen.
Wes Walden: What have been a number of the most essential facets of the change?
Andy Penn: The three most important components of the transformation have been simplifying the corporate to allow a profitable digitization program, shifting to agile methods of working, and restructuring and separating out bodily infrastructure belongings.
We wished to enhance our buyer expertise to place us on a par with corporations that present excellent customer support. Clients don’t simply evaluate their expertise with us with different telecom suppliers; they give thought to their expertise utilizing digital companies like Uber or checking in with an airline or at a lodge. I knew that to make a radical distinction, our buyer expertise needed to be very digitally enabled. And that meant a whole substitute of our digital setting. My view was that we might by no means succeed until we radically simplified the product setting.
For T22, we checked out what number of shopper and small-business merchandise we provided, and the reply was 1,800. The query grew to become how we may simplify that to a manageable quantity. At first, we aimed for 400, and the response was, “No, no, no, it might probably’t be completed.” I and others pushed again a number of instances, and we finally landed on 20 as the fitting quantity. That concentrate on 20 merchandise grew to become a forcing perform that required individuals to suppose very in another way, as a result of you possibly can’t make that massive a change with the method you’ve been utilizing.
When you’re going to essentially enhance buyer expertise, the best way to get there may be via digitizing. And in case you’re going to digitize, you additionally must simplify, however you’ll by no means achieve success in case you attempt to digitize the entire complexity of the previous.
Transferring to agile methods of working was one other actually essential piece of the reinvention. Not solely was it far more practical, it was additionally instrumental in driving cultural change and eradicating the resistance to vary inside our vertical capabilities. Whether or not it’s gross sales, advertising, IT, HR, or in any other case, there may be a variety of energy in these vertical buildings. And that’s the place the resistance to vary comes from, as a result of for anybody initiative, you’re going to have to barter with each a kind of vertical capabilities. That’s what slows issues down.
Transferring to agile methods of working was instrumental in driving cultural change and eradicating the resistance to vary inside our vertical capabilities.
Once you undertake agile, you begin the dialog with, “What are the issues that we’re going to ship within the subsequent quarter as a enterprise, whether or not it’s new merchandise or new performance or a brand new system or no matter it might be?” That’s your start line. After which, via agile, you allocate the sources, the capital, and the individuals to these initiatives instantly. So long as you get that formulation proper, it’s a gorgeous method to velocity up supply. We now have greater than 17,000 individuals working in agile within the firm. That has been basic to delivering on T22.
The third and last piece was separating out our passive infrastructure belongings. That has created new alternatives, when it comes to how effectively we run these companies and for brand spanking new progress. It’s additionally allowed us to usher in new funding companions to create worth.
‘An actual wake-up name’
Wes Walden: You had launched into a unique transformation journey from 2016 to 2017, however that modified. What occurred then, and the way did it spur your T22 reinvention drive?
Andy Penn: After I first grew to become CEO in 2015, we developed a imaginative and prescient to turn into a world-class know-how firm that empowers individuals to attach. And I nonetheless consider in that imaginative and prescient, nevertheless it didn’t land nicely available in the market, not as a result of individuals didn’t perceive it, however as a result of we have been so removed from being there that I simply don’t suppose it was seen as believable or real looking.
Then, in early 2016, we had a few critical community outages. That was an actual wake-up name as a result of considered one of our biggest worth propositions, community management, was shaken to the core. In mid-2016, I spotted that we wanted to make some main investments in our community and digital setting. In August of that 12 months, we introduced a $3 billion funding in our community. And that was in some ways the precursor to T22. I keep in mind making the purpose once we launched T22, in 2018, that we might not have been capable of launch it with out having kicked off these investments. They created the muse.
We additionally realized that the influence of the federal government’s Nationwide Broadband Community [NBN] was extra profound than we had anticipated. It was clear that the corporate had been too targeted on exterior sources of income as an answer to an financial headwind that we have been going to face with T22, versus a radical transformation or reinvention of the corporate.
We have been at an inflection level. There was the truth of the depth of the problem that the introduction of the NBN was creating each operationally and financially, coupled with the truth that the business was additionally going via a cyclical downturn. Our cellular revenues had been in decline. The dimensions of what we wanted to do grew to become extra obvious. We needed to purpose excessive out of necessity; I don’t suppose there was every other approach. The factor I’ve realized is that the upper you purpose, the more durable it’s to make use of the identical considering to get to a goal, which is at a a lot better distance.
The dimensions of what we wanted to do grew to become extra obvious. We needed to purpose excessive out of necessity; I don’t suppose there was every other approach.
Wes Walden: What have been essentially the most difficult facets of the journey?
Andy Penn: You’d in all probability say that we went via a large quantity of change in a comparatively brief period of time within the firm’s historical past. However within the second, it by no means felt quick sufficient. It’s onerous to remain disciplined with the technique and the method realizing that it’s going to take time for the outcomes to come back via. And in the meantime, you’re underneath a variety of strain from the market, the board, and different stakeholders who need rapid outcomes.
It’s all the time going to take time to do a whole modernization of the enterprise, a whole digital construct, and fully new digital stacks in an organization of this scale and measurement, after which get your present enterprise onto it. Maintaining stakeholders engaged, retaining individuals on board, retaining the group motivated is essential. Sustaining self-discipline within the early days once you’re not capable of exhibit the outcomes, once you’ve acquired a number of individuals within the group telling you you’re fallacious—holding your nerve is difficult.
Wes Walden: How did you steadiness the short-term strain on outcomes with realizing that it was going to take longer to vary?
Andy Penn: We have been specific concerning the street map and the metrics that we have been going to carry ourselves accountable to, and we have been clear concerning the progress we made in opposition to them. Within the scorecard that we printed, there have been roughly 60 particular person measures, and we ended up hitting 80 p.c of them. That was additionally difficult as a result of we have been nonetheless going via the headwinds attributable to the creation of the NBN, and that was having a monetary influence. However we have been capable of level to progress in opposition to all of our metrics, and since we have been clear about them and had them audited, the market may have faith in what we have been delivering.
Discovering the fitting match
Wes Walden: What about individuals and leaders in the course of the transformation?
Andy Penn: Folks selections are all the time troublesome, and when it is advisable make robust ones they by no means enhance with age—they’re not like a high quality wine. I made the fallacious appointments a number of instances when individuals have been simply not the fitting match. I had a few cycles of that in my first few years as CEO. Then, as we acquired into T22, it was clear that some individuals weren’t going to be proper for the journey, however that they had made contribution previously. There have been intervals when there was fairly a little bit of turnover and churn in my senior staff. It was a turbulent and really troublesome interval. Now, we’ve acquired an excellent staff that’s very aligned.
Wes Walden: What recommendation would you provide a CEO embarking on the same reinvention journey?
Andy Penn: I might emphasize that significantly in a big, complicated firm, readability of imaginative and prescient and technique, readability in your communications, and consistency are vastly essential. When you enable ambiguity to filter into what you’re attempting to do, abruptly you lose management of the agenda. Having a really clear technique and imaginative and prescient, and some beacons of the progress you make that you should use to strengthen that imaginative and prescient, is extremely essential.
An outdated boss used to say to me, “The underside line is that as CEO, you’ve acquired to turn into snug with being unreasonable.” You’re mainly the goalkeeper, and in case you let the ball via there isn’t a one else to catch it. You’ve acquired to be unreasonable as a result of that’s the way you stretch the aspiration and the way you in the end get one of the best out of your individuals and your groups.
I typically wrestle with this as a result of it feels a bit old-fashioned. However the governance structuring was crucially essential for us and for me. It could sound prefer it runs counter to the thought of agile, however I don’t suppose it does.
To me, the change administration processes and the governance course of have been extremely essential. The entire level about agile is being very clear about what the priorities are, what the targets and key outcomes are, what the metrics are, and what the street map is.
You must be diligent about measuring your self in opposition to these, after which if it is advisable change something, you alter transparently. What I spotted is that earlier than we put agile practices in place, individuals could be shifting the goalposts of any explicit program on a regular basis. Nevertheless it wouldn’t occur transparently. Wrestling with that has been extremely essential—so is doing that whereas cultivating innovation.
I hold coming again to agile as a result of it permits you to deal with the outcomes you attempt to ship as a enterprise, after which to be deliberate about allocating sources to these outcomes. Within the agile course of, sources can’t be dissipated onto different issues with out you realizing about it.
The ultimate piece of recommendation I’d give a CEO starting a reinvention is that this: all the time go to the place the puck goes. For instance, throughout COVID-19, we intentionally didn’t discuss whether or not issues have been going again to regular. As a substitute, we’d say, “OK, the place is that this going? We’re not all going again to the workplace, we’re going to do hybrid. And we’re going to embrace it, we’re going to undertake it.” It’s the identical dynamic with know-how: work out the place it’s going, and let’s get there sooner.
The recommendation I’d give a CEO starting a reinvention is that this: all the time go to the place the puck goes. It’s the identical dynamic with know-how: work out the place it’s going, and let’s get there sooner.
Hearts and minds
Wes Walden: What have you ever been most happy with?
Andy Penn: In lots of respects, it’s the staff, the tradition, and the best way we work. Your technique can change every now and then, the companies that you’re in can change every now and then. Expertise adjustments every now and then. However your tradition and the best way you’re employed and subsequently your potential to draw and inspire expertise—after which to use that to completely different, new issues—is what’s sustainable. How we’ve completed this, not simply what we’ve completed, is the factor I’m most happy with.
Wes Walden: How has your method to management modified via the reinvention course of?
Andy Penn: You possibly can lead in many alternative methods. Traditionally, I’ve been a ferociously logical and rational particular person. And that’s useful. You will get individuals to comply with you when you possibly can articulate clearly and tie all of it collectively to inform a cohesive and compelling story.
However in case you can faucet into the hearts and minds of individuals as nicely, that in lots of respects has extra pull than simply being rational. Studying to construct that reference to individuals multiplies the influence you possibly can have within the group. That’s not one thing that comes naturally to me, however that I’ve realized to develop. And technically, it’s not that tough. Constructing empathy with individuals and making them really feel as if they’ll join with you is actually all it’s about.
Comments (0)